<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Explorer Doesn&#8217;t Evaluate Any More Than 31 Style Elements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.engfers.com/2008/10/30/internet-explorer-doesnt-evaluate-any-more-than-31-style-elements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.engfers.com/2008/10/30/internet-explorer-doesnt-evaluate-any-more-than-31-style-elements/</link>
	<description>» scrumptions blog &#038; code » nothing more, nothing less</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:57:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: engfer</title>
		<link>http://www.engfers.com/2008/10/30/internet-explorer-doesnt-evaluate-any-more-than-31-style-elements/comment-page-1/#comment-740</link>
		<dc:creator>engfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engfers.com/?p=751#comment-740</guid>
		<description>The point of this article was &lt;b&gt;NOT&lt;/b&gt; &quot;hey, you should use 30 or more stylesheets!!!&quot;.

The point was that the problem exists out there, and there may be circumstances where it may happen.

&lt;b&gt;Workarounds are not complete solutions!&lt;/b&gt; Workarounds are meant to temporarily fix the problem while you take the time to find the correct solution. I guess I should have stated that...

Paul Davis has the most proper complete &lt;b&gt;solution&lt;/b&gt;. Stick a servlet in the response pipeline that filters the style tags into a single style tag. This method combined with sticking CSS in fewer style tags and external stylesheets will be your best bet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point of this article was <b>NOT</b> &#8220;hey, you should use 30 or more stylesheets!!!&#8221;.</p>
<p>The point was that the problem exists out there, and there may be circumstances where it may happen.</p>
<p><b>Workarounds are not complete solutions!</b> Workarounds are meant to temporarily fix the problem while you take the time to find the correct solution. I guess I should have stated that&#8230;</p>
<p>Paul Davis has the most proper complete <b>solution</b>. Stick a servlet in the response pipeline that filters the style tags into a single style tag. This method combined with sticking CSS in fewer style tags and external stylesheets will be your best bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Serdy</title>
		<link>http://www.engfers.com/2008/10/30/internet-explorer-doesnt-evaluate-any-more-than-31-style-elements/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>John Serdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engfers.com/?p=751#comment-734</guid>
		<description>&gt; 31 style calls is insane.

The web is insane! What if you are working on a complex information site with lots of advertising on it, and all the ads have their own style sheets?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; 31 style calls is insane.</p>
<p>The web is insane! What if you are working on a complex information site with lots of advertising on it, and all the ads have their own style sheets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thiago Souza</title>
		<link>http://www.engfers.com/2008/10/30/internet-explorer-doesnt-evaluate-any-more-than-31-style-elements/comment-page-1/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>Thiago Souza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 00:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engfers.com/?p=751#comment-729</guid>
		<description>This problem may raise when you&#039;re using component-oriented javascript development and a component instance does not do proper clean up upon it&#039;s destruction. (i.e. ExtJS 1.x grid)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This problem may raise when you&#8217;re using component-oriented javascript development and a component instance does not do proper clean up upon it&#8217;s destruction. (i.e. ExtJS 1.x grid)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2008 November 01 - Links for today &#171; My (almost) Daily Links</title>
		<link>http://www.engfers.com/2008/10/30/internet-explorer-doesnt-evaluate-any-more-than-31-style-elements/comment-page-1/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>2008 November 01 - Links for today &#171; My (almost) Daily Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 07:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engfers.com/?p=751#comment-725</guid>
		<description>[...] David J. Engfer points out a bug in Internet Explorer Doesn’t Evaluate Any More Than 31 Style Elements [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David J. Engfer points out a bug in Internet Explorer Doesn’t Evaluate Any More Than 31 Style Elements [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jive</title>
		<link>http://www.engfers.com/2008/10/30/internet-explorer-doesnt-evaluate-any-more-than-31-style-elements/comment-page-1/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>jive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engfers.com/?p=751#comment-723</guid>
		<description>Using 31 style calls is insane. Why not put your CSS in some PHP script that checks to see what you really need and then dump it out all at once in 1 STYLE tag rather than in several?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using 31 style calls is insane. Why not put your CSS in some PHP script that checks to see what you really need and then dump it out all at once in 1 STYLE tag rather than in several?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thiago Souza</title>
		<link>http://www.engfers.com/2008/10/30/internet-explorer-doesnt-evaluate-any-more-than-31-style-elements/comment-page-1/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>Thiago Souza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engfers.com/?p=751#comment-722</guid>
		<description>Why 31? Simple, 42 is the answer to life, the universe and everything else. 42 - 31 = 11 and according to Aeon Flux movie in the year 2011, 99% of the humanity will be wiped out because of a deadly virus, so Microsoft is warning you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why 31? Simple, 42 is the answer to life, the universe and everything else. 42 &#8211; 31 = 11 and according to Aeon Flux movie in the year 2011, 99% of the humanity will be wiped out because of a deadly virus, so Microsoft is warning you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.engfers.com/2008/10/30/internet-explorer-doesnt-evaluate-any-more-than-31-style-elements/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engfers.com/?p=751#comment-721</guid>
		<description>Seriously,why 31 elements?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously,why 31 elements?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.engfers.com/2008/10/30/internet-explorer-doesnt-evaluate-any-more-than-31-style-elements/comment-page-1/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engfers.com/?p=751#comment-720</guid>
		<description>The workaround would be to create a servlet filter to strip them all out and condense to a single style element.

It&#039;s a pretty small amount of work.

Good luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The workaround would be to create a servlet filter to strip them all out and condense to a single style element.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a pretty small amount of work.</p>
<p>Good luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.engfers.com/2008/10/30/internet-explorer-doesnt-evaluate-any-more-than-31-style-elements/comment-page-1/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engfers.com/?p=751#comment-719</guid>
		<description>bad bug to have but if you are putting that many style tags in your head tag then you should uninstall the al mighty dreamweaver and switch to a text editor.  See how much you like to write those style tags then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bad bug to have but if you are putting that many style tags in your head tag then you should uninstall the al mighty dreamweaver and switch to a text editor.  See how much you like to write those style tags then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.engfers.com/2008/10/30/internet-explorer-doesnt-evaluate-any-more-than-31-style-elements/comment-page-1/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engfers.com/?p=751#comment-718</guid>
		<description>Wow, and we just confirmed, the Knowledgebase article  you point to only lists through IE v6, but we tested 7 and 8 beta, they do the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, and we just confirmed, the Knowledgebase article  you point to only lists through IE v6, but we tested 7 and 8 beta, they do the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
